By: Osman Soura Kamara Esq
Introduction
“A society that cuts off from its youth, severs its lifeline, it is doomed to bleed to death.” The above were the spirited words of Kofi Annan. This highlights the critical role of young people as catalysts for global change, innovation, and progress. We must recognize that when youth are given the tools and opportunities to lead, they become pivotal agents for development and peace.
The increasing involvement of young people in African politics has become a significant topic of discussion, particularly following President Traore’s impact in Burkina Faso. While some view this as a resurgence of youthful leadership, it is important to emphasize democratic processes over military leadership. Drawing upon democratic theory, it is clear that legitimate power must be derived from the citizenry through established democratic institutions. Research in civil–military relations reinforces the notion that military leadership, although occasionally appealing as a rapid change mechanism, often lacks the longevity and stability that democratic legitimacy provides. History offers examples of youth-led coups that, despite initial success, ultimately faltered, highlighting the necessity of power springing from the people. I firmly believe that power should always derive from the people, not from military intervention.
Sierra Leone has recently seen a notable increase in young people pursuing political office. Youth are moving beyond supporting roles to seek meaningful influence within party structures. According to a recent survey, 60% of voters in Sierra Leone express support for younger candidates primarily due to their perceived ability to bring fresh perspectives and innovative solutions. This trend prompts a key question: Are these young candidates relying on their demographic relevance, or are they demonstrating true competence? To many, this phenomenon is a test and a call for the rise of young people whose destinies have been left far too long in the hands of old and thirsty leaders. For some, this shift represents overdue generational change; for others, including myself, it is a test of political and administrative ability. Ultimately, the effectiveness of young leaders will be determined over time.
Competence Must Trump Mere Relevance– Many have often held the view that some young aspirants lean heavily on their identity as members of the youth demography to justify their places in politics. This approach frames youthfulness itself as a qualification, appealing to frustrations with an older political elite that has dominated the system since independence. In a country yearning for change, this narrative often resonates with voters, especially younger ones, even when a candidate’s experience or policy depth remains limited.
A candidate may pursue a party leadership position despite lacking the necessary knowledge and expertise to address Sierra Leone’s longstanding challenges, such as unreliable electricity. Such individuals may continue their campaigns primarily to maintain political relevance and secure future appointments, a mindset I believe is common among some Sierra Leonean politicians. For example, Mr. Westminster runs for flagbearer for Party B knowing deep within he lacks the knowledge, expertise and competence to run a troubled and under-developed country like Sierra Leone where electricity has been the country’s major problem since Lawyer Sulaiman Kabba Koroma was born, yet Mr. Westminster continues the race knowing where he does not make it, he keeps his relevance for eventual ministerial positions when his party wins the Presidential elections. However, relying on relevance without competence risks continuing the very issues young politicians seek to change. While populism and emotional appeals may secure electoral victories, they do not guarantee effective governance. Competence must be the standard for lasting political influence. By competence, I mean a demonstrated mastery of policy intricacies, evidenced by a clear understanding of complex legislative issues and the ability to craft impactful solutions.
Additionally, a strong track record of ethical leadership, characterized by transparency and accountability, should be considered as a benchmark. Young leaders who pair their demographic advantage with skill, integrity, and policy expertise are more likely to drive meaningful change.
Conclusion– In encapsulating this topic, youthful competence is exemplified by politicians who prioritize human capital development, empowering young people with unlimited opportunities and thereby placing their future in their own hands. This is in line with the words of Franklin D. Roosevelt, who opined: “We cannot always build a future for our youths, but we can build our youth for the future.” While I am optimistic about the leadership potential of young people, I urge both politicians and citizens to prioritize competence over personal affiliations or favoritism when empowering youth. It is crucial for everyone in society to become champions of merit-based youth empowerment.
Together, we can ensure that the selection of young leaders is based on their skills and abilities rather than mere demographic appeal. Civic vigilance is essential, and all of us have a role to play in advocating for a system that values competence and integrity as the standards for leadership. I am eager to see how young people can contribute to Sierra Leone’s progress when entrusted with responsibility. Beyond their involvement, I advocate for carefully selecting young leaders who have demonstrated the competence to exceed expectations.
I also hope to see stronger institutions that equip young people to reach their fullest potential. Competence should be the primary criterion for advancement in our society. For Sierra Leone to progress, we need not only the inclusion of capable young leaders but also a commitment to building structures that support their development and ensure effective and competent service delivery.
